![]() I will be renewing some others though, although i have steered clear of any premium renewal domains.Download a PDF of the paper titled Towards Semantic Big Graph Analytics for Cross-Domain Knowledge Discovery, by Feichen Shen Download PDF Abstract: In recent years, the size of big linked data has grown rapidly and this I sold one to an enduser ade and I lost an auction to another one with cfd.trade There are some that are adopting these new TLD´s Could be quite a few years before new tlds see a big domainer tail off in renewals. It is emotionally easier to pay a renewal than let a domain drop. I think domainers tend to renew for several years before dropping. “Sure, new gTLD registries could technically even be profitable with the current quasi domainer-only numbers but in the absence of adoption and end user sales, how many domainers do you think will keep renewing inventory?” We also cannot forget that many small businesses are using Facebook, Youtube and other free platforms (wix, blogger, tumbler) as their internet presence – no need for any domain whatsoever. IMO domain investors paying extra before general availability and paying premium renewals for new TLDs in most cases will not see impressive returns at a portfolio level. TV since 2000 and while one does see limisted end user adoption of those extensions, the weekly DNJ sales reports don’t show massive numbers of five-figure sales in these TLDs on a regular basis. It would not surprise me to see limited adoption of perhaps up to a few dozen new TLDs over the next ten to fifteen years. ![]() End users are not stupid, some domainers are like lemmings for the most part. I don’t know when the time to start asking this question will be but eventually, it has to and will be in the spotlight.ĭomainers are suckers paying the way for these execs to keep buying more for 185K, and selling them back with $1000 renewals every year, when will these suckers learn. As of a certain point, end users have to start taking over because a domainer-only infinite revenue loop is out of the question. However, this situation can and should only be temporary. I’ve mentioned time and time again that at the beginning, domainers are an essential part (the most important one, by far) of a new gTLD registry’s business model. Sure, new gTLD registries could technically even be profitable with the current quasi domainer-only numbers but in the absence of adoption and end user sales, how many domainers do you think will keep renewing inventory? Otherwise, all new gTLD business models would crumble. For example, something like what Wikipedia is for Dot Org or what Internet Service Providers are for Dot Net.Īs domainers, we might think that everyone is talking about new gTLDs but let’s face it, at this point only we are □ Even that would normally not be enough (it would however at least be something) because to gain traction, new gTLDs would need huge websites as let’s call them ambassadors. Thus far, I can’t say I’ve seen any examples of new gTLD development success stories.Īnd by success stories, I mean sites that at the very least went viral. At this point yes, it works because it actually is quite early in the game but we will eventually have to start addressing this question because absolutely everything depends on it. ![]() ![]() This post’s objective is simply pointing out that the “it’s too early to ask that” argument can only work for so long. To be fair, now is *not* the time to start asking that question.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |